Tuesday 11 August 2015

Nuclear energy: Proving the capability and readiness of the companies.

In regard to Ir Dr Nahrul Khair Alang Md Rahsid's article, “Critical thinking key to public acceptance of nuclear energy” (NST, Aug 4 ), I believe that a few points from the writer should be reviewed. The writer seemed to put the blame on public perception as the main obstacle to fulfilling the government aspiration in nuclear power.  While the public technological literacy should be enhanced, I believe the authorities also should prove their readiness and capability to handle such energy.

On one side, it is undeniable that public's first impression of the nuclear technology is that it is a terrifying weapon. Since the atomic bomb incinerated Hiroshima and Nagasaki 70 years ago, turning them into hell, the image of nuclear has been badly tarnished. Nuclear seems to bring disaster to human civilization instead of being an alternative source of the fossil energy. However, face the fact, the nuclear has contributed 11 per cent to global electricity production through 400 reactors all over the world especially in developed countries. It shows that such energy is not as negative as people think. Thus, serious explanation of nuclear power, based on scientific facts should be improved in order to enlighten the public that such energy is safer and vital for the bright future.

On the other hand, the public's concern should not be belittled. In fact, most of them know the real fact of nuclear but what make them worry is the integrity and capability of those handling this energy especially in developing countries. A small incident at the nuclear reactor will cause the long-term catastrophe. Even Japan, one of the developed countries with high technology, experienced woe after the 2011 tsunami hit its nuclear plants. Focusing on our country, the history of Bukit Merah radioactive tragedy and the current bauxite issues are enough to influence public perception.

In conclusion, not only the way of explaining nuclear should be enhanced, but the capability, accountability, transparency and readiness of companies that conduct the nuclear project must also be proved to the public.
  

No comments:

Post a Comment